An open message to the people who want to draw the Prophet, and the people who want to kill them.
It is a sad reality that people still confuse the issue of drawing the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) an issue of free speech when it is more an issue of racism. What is worse is that people don’t understand why it is an issue of racism even if the drawings were to be ‘positive’ or ‘non-offensive’. Now we have idiots who are banning websites and declaring war on things that just need to be talked about intelligently, or in this case simplified for the masses of goons on both side of the argument.
First off, I’ll say I’m Muslim, genetically Pakistani, and a South Park fan.
There is a blaring irony that a show of a such high intellectual calibre would miss or neglect the issue of racism and look at it so lopsided as an issue of free speech. With amazing episodes like ‘With apologies to Jesse Jackson’. ‘Cartoon Wars’, ‘Imagination land’, among others, this seems to be a blind spot in an otherwise enlightened writers room. The excerpts here are from the genius work of the South Park writers from episode 1201 ‘ With apologies to Jesse Jackson’. An episode in which Stan’s father uses the N word as a guess for a Wheel of fortune clue, and Stan ends up trying to apologize to the token black student Token.
Stan: Listen, Token, my dad isn’t a racist. He’s just stupid, all right? He just blurted out the N word, and it’s no big deal, okay?
Token: Uh, well, actually it is kindofa big deal, Stan.
Stan:Token, my dad wasn’t trying to be offensive. Just forget about it.
Token:That’s easy for you to say, Stan.
Stan: Yeah, but he didn’t say it in anger or anything like that.
Token: That doesn’t mean I can just be fine.
If you really think it’s not a big deal, then you really are ignorant.
For those of you wondering, yes, I am comparing the N word to a picture of the Prophet. There is a separate issue of the use of the N word, ownership issues and so forth, but for the most part you don’t say it, and if you do you’re obviously not saying it around black people.
Stan: Hey Token. I just wanted to let you know that everything is cool now. My dad apologized to
Jesse Jackson.
Token: Oh I see, so I’m supposed to feel all better now.
Stan: Well, yeah.
Token:You just don’t get it, Stan!
Let me help clarify for those of you who ‘don’t get it’; the same way that there is no inoffensive way to say the N word, there is no inoffensive drawing of the Prophet Muhammad. Can you respectively offer a Muslim or Jew, halal(lawful) or kosher pork? No, you cannot, the very concept is a paradox. Obviously just because Muslims aren’t supposed to eat bacon that doesn’t mean other people won’t. But this is a little deeper than a dietary issue:
“You might believe in not being able to draw the prophet, but I don’t, so I’m gonna do it.”
Fine, but realize that’s like someone saying they don’t believe that words can never hurt like sticks and stones, so the N word in theory should be fine to say anywhere, any time.
Stan: Now look, Token, I’ve done everything I can to make this right! You have no reason to still
be mad!
Token: I have every reason to be mad! You just don’t get it!
Stan: I’m not responsible for what my dad did!
Token: No, but you can’t just pretend it never happened either!
Stan: What the hell do you want from me?!
Token: Nothing!
Stan: Then stop being mad!
Token: No!
It is possible to think this could be an issue of free speech and ‘Mozlems need to lighten up’, and yeah, at times we do. I will be the first to admit that no one should be killed over a stupid drawing. I always think back to a lesson of the Prophet Muhammad where an old lady would throw garbage on him on a daily basis and he never flinched until the day she stopped throwing it, only to see if she was Ok. No, do not start throwing garbage on Muslims to test to see what they will do, that’s like poking an angry and hungry bear. You will get mauled, and you will deserve it for being stupid enough to exercise you ‘right’ to poke an angry bear. The point of the story is that he wouldn’t have killed over a picture defacing him, so Muslims of this generation shouldn’t either.
Stan: [comes to a certain realization] Wait a minute. That’s it! I don’t get it.
Kyle: …Huh?
Stan: Don’t you see, Kyle?? I don’t get it! [smiles, then walks up to Token] Token, I get it now. I
don’t get it. I’ve been trying to say that I understand how you feel, but, I’ll never
understand. I’ll never really get how it feels for a black person to have somebody use the N
word. I don’t get it.
Token: Now you get it, Stan.
Stan: Yeah. I totally don’t get it.
Token: Thanks, dude.
There have been visual depictions of the Prophet among ancient Islamic empires and that Muslims are ignorant to those, or just don’t care enough to find and destroy them. Black people use the N word in rap music, does that make it Ok for us to say it all the time, or at all? There are black people who are offended by the use of the N word, even in a rap music context, similarly, there are Muslims who find those ancient depictions of the Prophet just as offensive as the ones made today, even if they aren’t meant to be offensive.
There is an issue here that is being overlooked though: the depiction of other Prophets. I love calling out other Muslims on their indifference to depictions of Jesus or Moses. But I suppose that they’ve been instilled with the notion that Muslims don’t really have any ownership over skinny white Jesus. Academics from different fields will probably tell you that Jesus was depicted that way to make poor pail skinned Christian peasants relate to the church. This brings up the question of why Moses is depicted the way he is. We know that South Park likes to stay true to its internal continuity, and that Moses originally appeared as a giant glowing face in the second or third season. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a coincidence that Moses appeared the way he did, but how would Jews react if he was depicted as a man? How would Muslims react?
Facebook.
Many of you may have heard that Facebook was, or may still be, banned in Pakistan for allowing a group called ‘Draw a Picture of Prophet Muhammad Day’ which somehow was able to allegedly enlist 44,000 people. All major internet providers disallowed Pakistani internet users from accessing Facebook, which must have pissed off more people (read youth), than the drawings of the Prophet did. Protesters blah blah blah’d about the evils of Facebook and called it a holy war or some nonsense, and I usually don’t care for these things, but I have to say I’m sort of impressed. Because aside from the fact that no one was killed, a welcomed change of pace, I’m also impressed that this was a form of protest that actually worked. It may appear to be a form of religious ‘censorship’, and I’m sure the western media will make it look like Muslims are after ‘your right to free speech’, but lets look at the chain of events:
Facebook allows a group promoting free speech and drawings of the Prophet, which we’ve already determined will always be offensive, if not racist. Due to Protests, Pakistani Government pressures the country’s internet providers to deny access to Facebook. The website loses millions of eager, addicted users who connect with millions maybe billions abroad. That is a big loss to traffic and ad revenue. Being hit where it matters, the bank accounts, Facebook takes down the group in question and capitalism prevails. I wish I could say reason, or democracy prevailed, I really wish I could, but it’s probably just not the case.
We can only allow the rights of the people who want to draw Muhammad, if we also give those same rights of ‘free speech’ to Racial supremacists, eg. KKK and Child pornographers, eg. NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association). On the same note, those people who think this is some sort of holy war won by the grace of Allah, you’re morons. This argument was won by the greed of the people running Facebook.
Now, can we please stop drawing pictures of the Prophet so that people stop getting angry and move onto something new? Peace be upon you, and maybe my next post won’t take a year or so.
Khy,